Error loading page.
Try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, there may be a network issue, and you can use our self test page to see what's preventing the page from loading.
Learn more about possible network issues or contact support for more help.

Defending a Serial Killer

The Right To Counsel

ebook
1 of 1 copy available
1 of 1 copy available
The Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States guarantee the right against self-incrimination, the right to remain silent, and the right to counsel.
A crime wave swept California in the late 1970s. Several young girls were abducted, raped, and murdered. Michael Dee Mattson was convicted of these crimes and sentenced to death.
Law clerk by day, family man by night.
In 1982, Jim Potts—a brilliant, idealistic, African American law student—is honored when one of his professors recruits him to assist in writing a death penalty appeal on behalf of a serial killer.
Potts discovers a loophole in the case that had somehow been overlooked. One that could not only get Mattson off death row, but once presented to the Supreme Court of California, could release him to rape and murder again. When Potts confides in his pregnant wife, she says if Mattson goes free, their marriage is over. But if Potts quits the case, or withholds information, he violates his duty to client and Constitution and risks his career before it even begins.
A moral dilemma with no good way out.
To avoid losing his family and releasing pure evil back into the world, Potts must be smarter than his options. He must find a way to keep his family together, fulfill his duties, and keep Mattson behind bars.
But can he?
  • Creators

  • Publisher

  • Release date

  • Formats

  • Languages

  • Reviews

    • Library Journal

      July 9, 2021

      Attorney Potts examines the ethics of being an American criminal defense lawyer in this memoir. As a law student in 1982, Potts helped on an appeal to overturn the conviction of a man on death row in California. Potts expresses little doubt that the man in question, Michael Lee Mattson, murdered at least three women in 1978, but his book focuses not on Mattson's culpability but rather on the police's violation of his legal rights during interrogation. He writes that after Mattson's arrest in Las Vegas, the investigating officer began a conversation with Mattson on casual subjects but eventually transitioned to talking about the three murders in question, even after Mattson had stated he did not want to discuss the charges against him. Mattson confessed to murdering and raping three women, and in 1979, he was convicted and sentenced to death. Potts worked on Mattson's appeal four years later, spending long hours at the Los Angeles Public Library in the pre-digital era. He eventually found four relevant cases, including Miranda v. Arizona, which established suspects' rights during police interrogations. While Potts's team was successful in overturning Mattson's conviction in California Supreme Court in 1984, it was in many ways a pyrrhic victory. (On retrial, Mattson was convicted again; he eventually died on death row.) Though Potts covers a lot of ground beyond the case itself, he skillfully summarizes complex legal arguments and reinforces that even people accused of the worst crimes are entitled to legal protections. Potts is less skilled when it comes to recreating dialogue, however, and the final chapters, which examine Mattson's mental health and similarities to other serial killers, seem more like the beginning of another book entirely rather than the conclusion to this one. VERDICT A deep dive into the research, ethics, and personal impact of defending the seemingly indefensible. This title will appeal to law students and others interested in the nuances of justice.--Bart Everts, Rutgers Univ.--Camden Lib., NJ

      Copyright 2021 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.

Formats

  • Kindle Book
  • OverDrive Read
  • EPUB ebook

Languages

  • English

Loading